"Millennium bomber" sentenced; trashing the Constitution not necessary

Ahmed Ressam, the man who was arrested in December 1999 with a bomb in his car as he attempted to enter the US at Port Angeles, Washington, has been sentenced to 22 years in prison.

The presiding judge, John C. Coughenour, had this to say:

We did not need to use a secret military tribunal, detain the defendant indefinitely or deny the defendant the right to counsel. Our courts have not abandoned the commitment to the ideals that set this nation apart.

[snip]

The message I would hope to convey in today's sentencing is twofold:

First, that we have the resolve in this country to deal with the subject of terrorism and people who engage in it should be prepared to sacrifice a major portion of their life in confinement.

Secondly, though, I would like to convey the message that our system works. We did not need to use a secret military tribunal, or detain the defendant indefinitely as an enemy combatant, or deny him the right to counsel, or invoke any proceedings beyond those guaranteed by or contrary to the United States Constitution.

I would suggest that the message to the world from today's sentencing is that our courts have not abandoned our commitment to the ideals that set our nation apart. We can deal with the threats to our national security without denying the accused fundamental constitutional protections.

Despite the fact that Mr. Ressam is not an American citizen and despite the fact that he entered this country intent upon killing American citizens, he received an effective, vigorous defense, and the opportunity to have his guilt or innocence determined by a jury of 12 ordinary citizens.

Most importantly, all of this occurred in the sunlight of a public trial. There were no secret proceedings, no indefinite detention, no denial of counsel.

The tragedy of September 11th shook our sense of security and made us realize that we, too, are vulnerable to acts of terrorism.

Unfortunately, some believe that this threat renders our Constitution obsolete. This is a Constitution for which men and women have died and continue to die and which has made us a model among nations. If that view is allowed to prevail, the terrorists will have won.

It is my sworn duty, and as long as there is breath in my body I'll perform it, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

This is what American justice should be. This is what we celebrate. The "Patriot" Act is a besmirching of the ideals that Americans have fought and died for, and a betrayal of our rights.

Technorati Tags: Ahmed Ressam, Patriot Act, Terrorism